ajayable

Your Guide to Smarter Hiring and HR Excellence.

Home » Workforce planning

Workforce planning

The Hollow Organisation: Why 2026 Cost-Cutting Triggers a Leadership Pipeline Crisis by 2030

by Leave a Comment

The Hollow Organisation: Why 2026 Cost-Cutting Triggers a Leadership Pipeline Crisis by 2030

In 2026, boardrooms will applaud efficiency. Leaders will point to payroll reductions, automated workflows, and short-term margin gains. The Leadership Pipeline Crisis begins here. I believe many organisations mistake financial neatness for strategic strength. By stripping out entry-level roles in pursuit of cost control, companies hollow out the very system that produces future leaders. What looks disciplined today sets up operational fragility tomorrow.

The numbers seduce. Sixty four percent of executives plan AI-driven headcount reductions, with junior and back-office roles first on the list. These positions appear expendable. In my opinion, they represent the apprenticeship layer of leadership. Remove the base, and the pyramid collapses. If entry-level employees vanish in 2026, who will carry institutional memory in 2030?

Short-Term Savings Create Long-Term Leadership Risk

Efficiency wins budgets. Talent debt destroys futures.

Boards reward fast results. Replacing junior roles with automation trims millions from operating costs. Research shows forty three percent of firms plan to replace roles with AI, targeting operations and entry-level staff. The Leadership Pipeline Crisis hides behind these numbers.

Every senior leader once started in those roles. Eliminate the entry point, and the journey ends before it begins. I believe modern efficiency misses a basic truth. The coordinator who understands every workaround becomes the manager who stabilises chaos. When the coordinator disappears, the feeder system fails. A balance sheet shows savings. The organisation absorbs structural damage.

Short-term savings vs, long term talent risk

Entry-Level Roles Anchor Institutional Knowledge

Leadership forms through exposure, not instruction.

Institutional knowledge lives outside manuals. It passes through observation, repetition, and context. Entry-level employees absorb how decisions get made, who influences outcomes, and where risks hide. This learning underpins the Leadership Pipeline Crisis.

David Ellis of Korn Ferry warns against halting junior hiring. Early-career professionals adopt technology faster than any other group. They translate tools into practice. When organisations cut these roles, competitors who retain them move faster. Agility follows people, not software.

Without internal pipelines, firms buy leadership externally. External hires cost more, integrate more slowly, and lack cultural context. Is a million saved today worth five million in search fees and failed transitions later? I believe most boards never run this math.

AI Agents Accelerate the Leadership Pipeline Crisis

Automation removes the work that teaches judgment.

By 2026, AI agents stop assisting and start operating. Entire workflow segments run without human intervention. Up to eighty per cent of transactional recruitment and administrative activity shifts to machines. This marks an inflexion point in the Leadership Pipeline Crisis.

AI twins free fifteen hours per employee each week. Productivity rises. Learning opportunities shrink. In my experience, administrative work trains professional instinct. Scheduling interviews teaches stakeholder dynamics. Resume screening teaches pattern recognition. When machines absorb this work, junior employees lose the training ground where judgment forms.

The result is not fewer people. It is fewer people with seasoned judgment.

The Skills Gap Widens the Leadership Pipeline Crisis

Technical fluency grows faster than human capability.

Sixty three percent of employers identify the skills gap as the main barrier to transformation through 2030. Here lies the paradox. AI-led job cuts widen the very gap leaders fear.

Executives chase AI expertise. Talent leaders prioritise critical thinking and problem-solving. Technical skills rank fifth. Why? Tools teach fast. Judgment develops slowly. Anyone learns prompting in weeks. Questioning output takes years.

A workforce fluent in tools but weak in evaluation fuels the Leadership Pipeline Crisis. When leaders lack the instinct to challenge machine output, risk multiplies.

Leadership Pipeline Crisis :Skills priority gap

Boomer Retirements Drain Leadership Capacity

Experience exists as apprentices disappear.

Retirements accelerate in 2026. Fifty nine percent of workers over fifty-five plan to retire within five years. Seventy two percent of managers fear losing critical expertise. The Leadership Pipeline Crisis intensifies from both ends.

Experienced mentors exit. Entry-level mentees never arrive. Knowledge transfer collapses. I believe organisations miss a simple buffer. Short-term rehiring of retirees buys time. It enables mentoring, documentation, and succession. Cost obsession blocks patience. The bridge collapses from both sides.

Leadership Pipeline Crisis :Retirement risk timeline

Redesigning Roles to Protect the Leadership Pipeline

Human work must evolve, not vanish.

The answer lies in redesign, not resistance. Organisations must stop eliminating junior roles and start reshaping them. AI handles routine tasks. Humans practice judgment, advisory work, and relationship management.

Return on investment must include biological return. If automation saves fifteen hours weekly, leaders must reinvest those hours into complex decision-making. Talent acquisition shifts from a cost centre to a strategic capability.

In my opinion, firms that survive the Leadership Pipeline Crisis treat early-career hiring as precision development, not volume intake.

Skills-First Hiring Strengthens the Leadership Pipeline

Ability outperforms pedigree.

Degrees lose dominance. Only forty one percent of job seekers view degrees as essential. Skills-first hiring expands access and accuracy.

Ninety per cent of firms using skills-based hiring report fewer hiring mistakes. Ninety four percent see stronger performance. Skills verification now happens instantly through digital credentials. Ability replaces background.

I believe skills-first hiring stands as a structural defence against the Leadership Pipeline Crisis. Future leaders solve problems. Credentials are never guaranteed.

Leadership Pipeline Crisis :The performance premium of skills-first hiring

Internal Mobility Builds Leadership Capacity

The next leader already works inside.

External markets fluctuate. Internal capability compounds. Fifty one percent of employers plan to redeploy talent internally. The Leadership Pipeline Crisis often reflects imagination failure.

Internal talent marketplaces reveal transferable skills. AI supports matching and learning pathways. Careers shift from ladders to networks. When organisations invest in growth, employees invest in outcomes.

If leaders of 2030 cannot be hired, they must be built.

Data Storytelling Makes the Leadership Pipeline Visible

Boards respond to evidence, not warnings.

Recruitment success no longer rests on time-to-fill. It rests on impact. Talent leaders must prove performance, retention, and revenue contribution.

Quality of hire declines when automation dominates. Cost-per-hire improves. Boards see one metric and miss the risk. In my opinion, the Leadership Pipeline Crisis persists because boards track the wrong signals. Ultimately, predictive analytics and human judgment will decide who wins. 

Leaders who connect hiring data to business outcomes secure sponsorship and budget.

Human and AI Teams Demand New Leadership

The challenge shifts from technology to trust.

Hybrid teams define 2026. Yet only twenty two percent of leaders trust managers to lead humans and AI together. This gap feeds the Leadership Pipeline Crisis.

Managers must know when to override machines, manage conflict, and coordinate mixed teams. AI-ready leaders translate strategy into execution. Software equalises access Human judgment differentiates outcomes. Ultimately, it is the human edge—essential capabilities, not AI—that will define the future of work. 

Here’s What I Think

The next five years belong to workforce orchestrators. Talent leaders’ step beyond operations into strategic authority. Those who reclaim time through AI become advisors on transformation.

But hollow organisations fail regardless of technology. Eliminating entry-level roles for margin equals corporate cannibalism. The future gets consumed to fund the present.

I believe the human machine frontier demands a new idea. Silicon mentorship. AI should capture retiring knowledge and train early-career talent. Apprenticeship programs should hire a junior human and an AI agent together.

Ground these actions now:

  1. Replace headcount reduction with talent elevation. Reinvest automation savings into reskilling.
  2. Test critical thinking in every interview. Machines handle proficiency.
  3. Redesign entry-level roles into specialised tracks from day one.
  4. Quantify the Leadership Pipeline Crisis. Show boards when leadership supply collapses.

The future of work is not speed. It is structured. Leadership in 2030 depends on which organisations develop today. Software scales. People decide.

Recruitment Strategy 2026: Why AI, Skills, and Human Judgment Will Redefine Hiring

by Leave a Comment

Recruitment Strategy 2026

Recruitment Strategy 2026 marks a structural break from the past, not an incremental upgrade. In my experience, every decade brings new tools, but once in a generation, the rules themselves change. This is that moment. The relationship between humans and technology in hiring is being rebuilt, with artificial intelligence no longer positioned as support infrastructure but as an autonomous participant in the system itself. At the same time, skills, judgment, and organisational resilience are replacing credentials, job titles, and rigid hierarchies as the real currency of talent.

Leaders who continue to optimise yesterday’s recruitment models will struggle. Organisations that redesign for this new reality will gain a lasting advantage.

AI Breaks Through: Recruitment Strategy 2026 Elevates the Autonomous Hiring Partner

AI Crosses the Line from Tool to Autonomous Hiring Partner

The defining shift in Recruitment Strategy 2026 is the transformation of AI from a productivity aid into an autonomous hiring agent. This is not automation at the margins. It is a reallocation of decision-making power inside the recruitment workflow.

AI agents are now expected to manage entire segments of hiring with minimal human intervention. Screening, scheduling, candidate queries, compliance documentation, and workflow orchestration are no longer human-led activities supported by software. They are machine-run systems with humans overseeing outcomes. Up to 80 per cent of transactional recruitment activity is projected to be handled this way, fundamentally altering cost structures, speed, and scale.

More striking is the emergence of the AI Twin. Recruiters are building digital counterparts that operate continuously, updating systems, drafting communications based on historical patterns, and monitoring talent databases for changes. In practical terms, this frees more than half a workday every week for strategic work. In strategic terms, it creates parallel intelligence inside the organisation.

Perhaps the most consequential signal is belief. A majority of workers familiar with recruitment practices now expect AI to run the entire hiring process by the end of 2026. When perception shifts this decisively, adoption follows.

Share of Recruitment Activities Managed by AI

Share of Recruitment Activities Managed by AI (Projected)

Recruitment Strategy 2026 Recasts the Human Role: Strategic or Irrelevant

The Human Role Does Not Disappear. It Becomes Strategic or Irrelevant

When machines handle execution, humans must own judgment. Recruitment Strategy 2026 leaves no room for the traditional recruiter profile built around coordination, administration, and process management. Those tasks are now automated at scale.

What remains is the work only humans can do well — building trust with passive candidates, advising leaders on talent trade‑offs, designing roles that align capability with future business models, and interrogating AI output when it looks confident but wrong.

This shift demands an entirely new skill set. The recruiter must evolve into something broader, more adaptive, more strategically literate. A multiversed recruiter is becoming essential in talent acquisition, because versatility now shapes how organisations adapt, hire, and compete — a shift that elevates the role from process operator to strategic problem‑solver.

In my opinion, this is where many organisations will falter. Leaders assume AI fluency is the missing skill. Talent leaders, closer to the work, know the real gap is critical thinking. Humans must spot bias, detect hallucinations, and decide when to override algorithmic recommendations. Yet only a small minority of leaders believe their organisations are ready to manage hybrid human-AI teams effectively.

Managing people has always been complex. Managing people and machines together requires a new leadership approach.

Leadership Readiness for Human-AI Teams

Leadership Readiness for Human-AI Teams

Recruitment Strategy 2026 Elevates Skills as the Backbone of Talent Strategy

Skills Replace Credentials as the Backbone of Talent Strategy

The Recruitment Strategy 2026 accelerates a shift that has been quietly building for years. Degrees, job titles, and linear career paths no longer predict performance. Skills, applied judgment, and learning velocity do.

Organisations are moving decisively toward skills-first hiring models, widening talent pools while reducing costly mis-hires. This is not ideological. It is economic. Skills-based hiring improves match quality and resilience at a time when roles evolve faster than job descriptions can keep up.

At the same time, assessment integrity is under pressure. Generative AI has made polished resumes and rehearsed interview answers universal. The signal-to-noise ratio has collapsed. Leaders must respond by redesigning assessments around lived experience, practical demonstrations, and problem-solving in context. The goal is not to ban AI use by candidates, but to test what AI cannot fake.

Hiring Criteria Shift in Recruitment Strategy 2026

Hiring Criteria Shift in Recruitment Strategy 2026

Recruitment Strategy 2026 Confronts the Quiet Crisis in Entry-Level Talent Pipelines

Recruitment Strategy 2026 risks solving today’s costs while creating tomorrow’s shortage.

One of the least discussed consequences of Recruitment Strategy 2026 is the erosion of entry-level roles. As organisations replace junior and back-office positions with AI to cut costs, they eliminate the training ground where future leaders learn how the organisation actually works.

This is short-term optimisation with long-term consequences. Without entry-level pathways, organisations lose institutional memory, succession depth, and cultural continuity. They are then forced into expensive external hiring for senior roles, often importing capability without context.

In my experience, leadership pipelines do not fail suddenly. They decay quietly, then collapse under pressure.

Long-Term Impact of Entry-Level Role Elimination

Long-Term Impact of Entry-Level Role Elimination

Candidate Experience Emerges as the Defining Constraint in Recruitment Strategy 2026

Recruitment Strategy 2026 treats experience as infrastructure, not branding.

In Recruitment Strategy 2026, candidate experience moves from employer branding rhetoric to operational necessity. Speed, transparency, and responsiveness now directly influence offer acceptance and talent access.

Candidates increasingly expect feedback within 48 hours. Delays are interpreted as disinterest or dysfunction. At the same time, pay transparency is becoming non-negotiable, driven by regulation and competitive pressure. Salary bands, progression frameworks, and equity disclosures are no longer optional signals of trust.

Return-to-office mandates further complicate the picture. Organisations that insist on rigidity shrink their talent pools and inflate compensation costs. Flexibility is no longer a perk. It is a market filter.

Candidate Expectations in Recruitment Strategy 2026

Candidate Expectations in Recruitment Strategy 2026

Recruitment Strategy 2026 Transforms Hiring Infrastructure with Modular Talent Models

Recruitment Strategy 2026 rewards adaptability over scale.

Economic uncertainty has exposed the inefficiency of fixed recruitment infrastructure. Recruitment Strategy 2026 favours modular models that scale capability up or down as needed. Short-term RPO partnerships, specialised external expertise, and flexible delivery models allow organisations to respond quickly without heavy capital investment.

This is not outsourcing for cost alone. It is architectural flexibility applied to talent.

Here’s What I Think

Recruitment Strategy 2026 is not about AI adoption. It is about organisational courage. Leaders must decide whether they are redesigning hiring for the future or automating the past.

AI will do the heavy lifting. Skills will replace credentials. Candidates will demand transparency and speed. The differentiator will be human judgment. Organisations that treat recruiters as strategic architects, not process managers, will win. Those that do not will move faster, cheaper, and in the wrong direction.

The future of hiring is already here. The only question left is who is willing to rebuild it.

Workforce Readiness: How AI-Driven Organisations Are Redefining Hiring for the Future

by Leave a Comment

Workforce Readiness

The New Currency of Workforce Readiness

In a world shaped by generative AI, hiring for readiness—not résumés—will define who wins.

The drumbeat of technological change is relentless. Artificial Intelligence—especially Generative AI (GenAI)—is transforming how we work, learn, and lead. This isn’t a distant prospect; it’s already reshaping industries with an intensity rivalling the Industrial and Digital Revolutions. In this new reality, Workforce Readiness has become the defining factor that determines which organisations adapt, thrive, or fall behind.

The real question for leaders today isn’t how to fill jobs but how to ensure the workforce is truly ready for what’s next. In my experience, the answer lies in integrating modern learning trends into the very fabric of recruitment. Workforce readiness is no longer a human capital aspiration; it’s an economic imperative.

The Acceleration Imperative: Why Workforce Readiness Can’t Wait

AI is creating opportunity at record speed—but only for those equipped to harness it.

The 2025 employment landscape is defined by unprecedented dynamism. As AI, robotics, and automation converge, they’re not just reshaping jobs —they’re redefining value. The potential economic uplift from AI is estimated at $15.7 trillion by 2030, but realising that promise depends on one thing: how ready people are to work alongside intelligent machines.

According to Coursera, GenAI has become the fastest-growing skill among enterprise learners, showing an 866% year-over-year spike in course enrollments. This isn’t limited to Silicon Valley—half of these learners are in emerging economies like India, Colombia, and Mexico.

That global diffusion signals a power shift: talent globalisation through learning. Readiness now transcends geography.

Global AI skill adoption

The Learning Revolution: How Skill Trends Are Redefining Readiness

The skills defining workforce readiness in 2025 blend technology, risk literacy, and communication mastery.

Coursera’s data paints a revealing picture of what readiness looks like. The top skills of 2025 are led by Generative AI, followed by HR technology, risk mitigation and control, assertiveness, and threat management.

Beyond those, emerging must-haves include incident management, stakeholder communication, and data ethics—a mix that captures both the digital and human sides of the future workplace.

Fastest-Growing Job Skills for Workforce Readiness (2025)

Fastest-growing job skills for workforce readiness

What fascinates me most is the divergence between learner groups:

  • Employees seek productivity and innovation—taking courses like “Generative AI for Everyone.”
  • Students focus on theoretical AI foundations, preparing for long-term technical careers.
  • Job seekers chase applied machine learning and reinforcement learning to meet immediate job-market demand.

Different paths, same goal: readiness.

From Learning to Hiring: Integrating Skill Signals into Recruitment

The smartest companies now hire for potential, not pedigree.

This is where the readiness revolution meets recruitment strategy. Traditional hiring models—based on credentials and past experience—are giving way to skills-based hiring and learning agility assessments.

By 2030, 48% of employers plan to use direct skills assessments, compared to 43% still requiring degrees. This signals a decisive shift toward evaluating what people can do rather than what they’ve done.

Organisations that embed learning trends into hiring gain a sharper lens on future performance. Here’s how leaders are operationalising that shift:

  • Skills-Based Hiring: Dropping degree requirements to evaluate candidates by demonstrated skills. Adoption rates already exceed 30% in India and 34% in South Africa—well above the global average.
  • Evaluating Learning Mindset: Asking candidates what they’ve learned lately—through courses, projects, or certifications—signals readiness and adaptability.
  • Targeted Recruitment by Skill Trend: Actively sourcing for high-growth areas like GenAI, cybersecurity, and data ethics.
  • Learning Platform Partnerships: Collaborating with providers like Coursera to map skill trends and identify talent pipelines early.

This alignment transforms recruitment from a static process into a living readiness ecosystem.

Overcoming Barriers: Closing the Workforce Readiness Gap

Readiness demands culture change, not just training budgets.

Despite progress, many organisations face the same obstacles: skills gaps, resistance to change, and limited investment. Globally, leaders are tackling these through four major strategies—reskilling, targeted hiring, DEI expansion, and cross-border mobility.

Regional Workforce Readiness Strategies by 203

Regional Workforce Readiness Strategies by 2030

No two regions face identical readiness challenges—but all share one truth: culture eats strategy when learning stops.

To thrive, organisations must normalise upskilling as part of work itself, not as a remedial fix.

Human + Machine: The Future Frontier of Workforce Readiness

AI won’t replace people—but people who embrace AI will replace those who don’t.

The future of hiring lies at the intersection of human capability and machine intelligence. GenAI will augment far more jobs than it replaces, but this augmentation demands new literacy.

Employers are already investing in prompt-writing and AI collaboration skills—areas where human creativity and contextual reasoning remain irreplaceable.

In my opinion, the most valuable workers of the next decade will be hybrids: analytically strong, emotionally intelligent, and endlessly curious.

Human vs. AI-Resilient Skills for Workforce Readiness

Human vs. AI-Resilient Skills for Workforce Readiness

These skills are the connective tissue of workforce readiness—the traits AI can’t mimic but depends on to succeed.

Here’s What I Think

The divide between learning and hiring is collapsing—and that’s a good thing.

In my experience, the future belongs to organisations that stop hiring just for talent and start hiring for learning. Tomorrow’s most valuable employees won’t just fit a role—they’ll grow it.

That’s why I believe in reimagining hiring through what I call “Learn-to-Earn” interviews. Instead of traditional Q&A, candidates could complete short, role-relevant learning modules—say, a 90-minute course on prompt engineering or data ethics—and present what they learned. Their curiosity, adaptability, and speed of insight become part of the evaluation.

I also advocate for Reverse Mentoring programs focused on AI literacy—where digital natives mentor senior leaders on emerging tools. This bridges generations and accelerates readiness.

Ultimately, workforce readiness isn’t a one-time goal. It’s a living capability—a measure of how fast organisations learn, unlearn, and evolve.
Recruitment, in that context, becomes not just about filling roles but about building resilience.

And in a world where AI is rewriting every playbook, resilience is the only skill that never goes out of date.

Sources of Insights

  1. World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025.
  2. The Global Skills Report – Coursera

Skilled Trades Innovators: The Great Career Pivot and What Leaders Must Do Next

by Leave a Comment

Skilled Trades Innovators

The foundations of the global labour market have shifted. Today, a growing number of college-educated young adults are abandoning the assumed straight line from degree to desk and choosing skilled trades instead. That choice is not a retreat. It is a strategic recalibration driven by economic pressure, automation anxiety, and the realisation that hands-on, high-skill work often resists replacement by software. I believe this movement marks the rise of a new class of professionals — Skilled Trades Innovators — and it demands a strategic response from leaders and organisations.

The Strategic Career Pivot

A structural, not cyclical, reordering of career expectations driven by risk, debt, and durable value.

For decades, the professional script was simple. A college degree promised upward mobility and white-collar stability. That script is fraying. Recent data show 37 per cent of Gen Z college graduates are now working in or actively pursuing blue-collar roles. That figure is not anecdotal. It is the signal of a large-scale reallocation of human capital toward roles perceived as resilient to automation and immediately in earning potential.

This pivot is rational. Graduates face heavy debt burdens, a sluggish entry-level job market, and a technology wave that can hollow out clerical and standardised knowledge work. The decision to pivot into trades is a hedged bet. It trades uncertain returns on a degree for paid apprenticeships, a faster path to income, and what many graduates see as work that will remain necessary regardless of algorithmic progress.

Skilled Trades Innovators and the AI Calculus

Young professionals are choosing roles where cognition meets craft because those roles are harder to automate.

Generative AI and automation have changed how entrants assess career risk. Roughly one quarter of graduates entering trades cite AI resilience as a key reason for their choice. Organisations across industries already anticipate major transformation. One study notes that 41 percent of organisations expect to reduce their workforce before 2030 as a result of automation. Employers predict that AI and information processing technologies will transform most operations within a few years. These expectations shape risk perception for a generation steeped in digital fluency.

Put simply, AI is exceptionally good at pattern recognition, optimisation, and repeatable cognitive tasks. It struggles in non-standard physical environments where human judgement, real-time improvisation, and manual problem-solving matter. Wiring a house, diagnosing a machine in an unpredictable setting, or adapting to on-site anomalies are tasks where human skill remains essential. Skilled Trades Innovators combine cognitive skills with situational dexterity. That mix makes them hard to replace.

Future Proofing Careers

Economics That Explain the Shift

Debt, earnings reality, and immediate paid training make trades a rational financial choice.

Financial calculus drives behaviour. The average student loan debt is over $38,000. For many graduates, the return on a degree is uncertain. Study reports that 19 percent of graduates shifted to blue-collar work because they could not find roles in their field, 16 percent because they were not earning enough, and another 16 percent because their degree did not lead to the expected career. Paid apprenticeships invert the traditional investment model. They offer on-the-job income from day one and reduce dependence on loans.

Wages in skilled trades are better than the stereotype implies. Experienced electricians, plumbers, and HVAC technicians report median wages in the $60,000 to $80,000 range. Top performers often surpass six figures. When you factor in job security, fewer debts, and clear progression to entrepreneurship or business ownership, the long-term financial narrative for trades is compelling.

Skilled Trades Innovators-Average Early Career Income Trajectory and Debt Burden

Skilled Trades Innovators: High-Tech, High-Touch Work

Modern trades are cognitive workzones where analytical skill and hands-on capability converge.

A persistent misperception is that blue-collar work equals low-tech labour. The reverse is true in many growth areas. Manufacturing uses advanced robotics and machine vision. Electricians integrate smart building systems. Solar and wind technicians work with power electronics and grid software. The tradecraft of 2025 demands analytical thinking, systems literacy, and the ability to manage automation. The World Economic Forum data lists analytical thinking, resilience, leadership, and creative thinking among the most valued skills. Those are the exact capabilities college education cultivates. A graduate who understands systems thinking and can apply it to physical infrastructure becomes a multiplier in any trade setting.

Skilled Trades Innovators-Skill Profiles of Growing vs Declining Roles

Skilled Trades Innovators and the Green Transition

Decarbonisation creates durable demand for trade skills tied to new infrastructure.

Energy transition and climate adaptation are structural demand drivers. Nearly half of surveyed employers anticipate emissions reduction efforts will be a major driver of organisational transformation. Investments in climate adaptation are close behind. Those priorities create demand for roles like renewable energy technicians, electric vehicle specialists, and environmental engineers. These roles require practical installation and maintenance skills plus the ability to engage with digital monitoring systems and smart grids. Skilled Trades Innovators who acquire green specialisations will find exceptional wage growth and mobility.

Skilled Trades Innovators-Projected for Key Green Roles

Skilled Trades Innovators in a Churning Global Market

Structural labour-market churn plus weak entry-level hiring make trades an attractive, available path.

Global labour markets are in flux. Youth unemployment is markedly higher than aggregate unemployment in many regions. Youth unemployment rates such as 10.8 percent in the United States and substantially higher rates in several emerging economies. Employers report that structural changes will affect a significant share of jobs by 2030, and yet they also forecast the creation of millions of new roles during this transition. In this context, trades offer immediate opportunity and a more predictable route to stable income. For employers, this is a chance to tap a resilient talent pool that other firms overlook.

Global Jobs Transition by 2030

How Employers Can Win Skilled Trades Innovators

Companies that reframe trades as innovation careers will secure a competitive advantage in talent and operations.

Leaders must stop treating the trades as a labour reserve and start treating them as strategic talent channels. That requires three tactical shifts.

  1. Design College-Graduate Apprenticeships. Create structured programs that respect the analytical background of graduates and accelerate pathway timelines. Offer leadership modules, technical certifications, and rapid role rotations. Show career maps that lead to foreman, project manager, and business owner roles.
  2. Offer Financial Incentives that Address Debt. Tuition assistance for certification, sign-on bonuses, and transparent pay bands make the total compensation proposition clear and competitive versus a debt-laden degree path.
  3. Adopt Skills-First Hiring. Reduce reliance on degree checkboxes and emphasise demonstrated competencies. Research shows employers are adopting skill-based hiring and prioritising work experience and pre-employment tests over university degrees. Use skills assessments, simulation-based hiring, and apprenticeship interviews.

These moves are not charity. They are strategic investments in operational resilience. Employers who build talent funnels into critical infrastructure roles will reduce vacancy costs, shorten time-to-competence, and retain institutional knowledge.

The Skills-First Imperative for Skilled Trades Innovators

Upskilling, not credentials, will determine who succeeds in a hybrid human-machine labour market.

Employers already intend to reskill their workforce at scale. The studies records that 85 percent of employers plan to offer retraining and 77 percent plan to provide AI training. What matters most is the content of that training. The skills differentiating growing roles are analytical thinking, resilience, programming and technological literacy. These are not academic niceties. They are practical tools for diagnosing, integrating, and optimising semi-autonomous systems on site.

For leadership teams, the mandate is clear. Invest in modular learning. Blend vocational instruction with systems engineering basics. Create competency ladders that pair hands-on craft with data literacy. In my experience, cross-trained individuals who can read a digital fault log, interpret sensor data, and then fix a physical fault will become the linchpins of industrial operations.

Here’s What I Think

This is not a nostalgia-driven return to physical labour. It is a forward-looking strategy for resilient, skilled work.

The great career pivot toward skilled trades is a rational, market-driven response to modern uncertainty. I believe that calling these roles “blue-collar” will be obsolete by 2035. The future rewards those who combine analytical acumen with applied skill. The Skilled Trades Innovators are not rejecting technology. They are embracing it on their terms. They are work designers who use systems thinking to make physical systems more reliable, efficient, and sustainable.

If you lead people or plan workforce strategy, act now. Double down on skills-first hiring. Build graduate-friendly apprenticeship tracks. Fund lateral reskilling for mid-career employees in declining roles. Reimagine compensation to reflect the scarcity and strategic value of these skills. Organisations that move aggressively to win talent wars will convert a potential talent shortage into an enduring competitive advantage.

Actionable Checklist for Leaders

Concrete steps you can start this quarter to attract and retain Skilled Trades Innovators.

  • Launch a pilot college-graduate apprenticeship with a clear 12- to 24-month competency map.
  • Create a tuition and certification fund targeted to green and automation-resistant trades.
  • Replace degree-only job postings with skills-first descriptions and simulation-based assessments.
  • Identify 3 mid-career roles at risk from automation and design reskilling pathways into trade specialisations.
  • Publish transparent pay bands for trade roles and benchmark against local market median wages.

Skilled Trades Innovators are both a solution and a signal. They tell us which work will matter in a world of smarter machines. Leaders who recognise this shift will redesign hiring, compensation, and training to capture durable value. Those who cling to outdated credential hierarchies will watch the best talent choose security and agency over uncertain prestige.

Sources of insights:

World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025.
4 in 10 Gen Z College Grads Are Turning To Blue-Collar Work for Job Security
4 Forces Fueling Gen Z’s Shift To Blue‑Collar Jobs
The rising pressures for Gen Z in the global job market

Degrees Without Direction: Solving the India Career Guidance Crisis

by Leave a Comment

Degrees Without Direction: Solving the India Career Guidance Crisis

India’s demographic dividend is often hailed as its greatest asset: a young, ambitious workforce poised to power the next economic leap. But beneath the surface of rising college enrollments and tech-savvy youth lies a quiet catastrophe. The vast majority of students—90%, to be exact—are choosing careers blindly. Not by design. By accident. The India Career Guidance Crisis is real—and it’s quietly sabotaging the country’s demographic dividend.

The 90% Drift: How the India Career Guidance Crisis Begins

Ask any working professional in India, “Are you doing what you once dreamed of?” Most hesitate. Many say no. That’s the first symptom of the India Career Guidance Crisis. The disconnect isn’t due to lack of opportunity—it’s a failure of direction. Career guidance in India is still seen as a luxury, not a necessity. A United Nations study confirms this: only 10% of students receive expert career advice or even know it exists.

The rest? They drift—nudged by family pressure, social inertia, and outdated notions of “safe” jobs. In my opinion, allowing the foundation of our economic future to operate with such a massive information deficit is not just negligent. It’s economically reckless.

Misguided by Design: The Scale of India’s Career Guidance Crisis

India has the world’s largest youth population and one of the biggest education systems. Yet career counselling is treated as an afterthought. When 9 out of 10 students rely on anecdotal advice—from cousins, relatives, or the neighbourhood uncle—the results are predictably flawed.

Source of AdvicePercentage of Students
Family/Friends90%
Professional Counsellors10%

Sources of Career Advice Among Indian Students

Students choose familiarity over fit. They pick what they’ve heard of—not what suits their aptitude or personality. As Yasir Ali, director at YAC Edtech, notes, when structured guidance is absent, decisions default to limited, often misleading information.

The crisis runs deeper. Eight in ten students struggle to choose careers because they lack clarity on options, institutional quality, and prospects. Only 10% know the actual cost of the courses they enrol in. That’s not just an information gap—it’s a trap.

Private Schools, Same Problem: India Career Guidance Crisis Spares No One

A UN survey of 21,239 students across Classes 9 to 12 in seven states revealed a counterintuitive truth: private school students are more uncertain about their future than their government school peers.

School TypeUnsure About Career Path
Private Schools41%
Government Schools35%

Student Uncertainty by School Type

Even where counselling exists, it’s often unstructured or ineffective. The India Career Guidance Crisis is systemic—cutting across income levels, geographies, and school types.

The Economic Fallout: Degrees Wasted, Decades Lost

Career misalignment doesn’t end at graduation. It follows students into the workforce, where they land in roles they never wanted—working not from passion, but from fear of unemployment.

According to Gallup’s 2024 Global Workplace Report, only 14% of Indian employees say they’re thriving. The global average? 34%. That gap is a direct result of the India Career Guidance Crisis. When jobs are chosen under pressure, productivity suffers. So does mental health.

In my assessment, these aren’t just wasted degrees. They’re wasted decades.

Misalignment Starts Early—and Ends in Burnout

India’s employability crisis is well-documented. The India Skills Report and NASSCOM studies consistently show that nearly half of graduates aren’t job-ready. In engineering, only 20–25% meet industry standards.

Why? Because many students never wanted to be engineers in the first place. They chose the field under pressure, not passion. By the time they realise the mismatch, they’re years deep into a discipline they dislike.

The India Career Guidance Crisis starts early—and ends in burnout.. Surveys show that professionals unhappy with their career paths are more likely to experience chronic stress. The friction of being in the wrong role wears them down.

Institutional Gaps: Why Guidance Is Still a Luxury

The infrastructure for career guidance is appalling. Most government schools don’t offer it. Private schools treat it as a premium add-on. The student-to-counsellor ratio is often in the thousands—or worse, nonexistent.

When guidance is tacked onto a teacher’s already overloaded schedule, it becomes a ritual, not a resource. As Gaurav Tyagi of Career Xpert puts it, true guidance means helping students appreciate their aptitudes and explore diverse paths. That’s not happening. The India Career Guidance Crisis is institutional.

Cultural Inertia: The 1980s Template Still Rules

The deeper challenge is cultural. Many Indian parents still push the “holy trinity” of engineering, medicine, and civil services—viewing the economy of 2025 through the lens of 1980.

Family conversations rarely touch on AI, renewable energy, design thinking, or climate tech. These are the growth sectors of the global economy. Yet they remain invisible to students making life-altering decisions. Outdated mindsets fuel the India Career Guidance Crisis.

I believe this mindset must be dismantled. In countries like the UK, Canada, and Australia, students undergo formal grooming, career fairs, and aptitude tests before choosing university courses. India must follow suit.

The Path Forward: Policy Reform Meets Tech Innovation

The question isn’t whether India can afford career guidance. It’s whether it can afford to ignore it.

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 offers a starting point. Its emphasis on vocational and multidisciplinary education is promising. But policy alone won’t solve the India Career Guidance Crisis. Implementation must be deliberate and bold.

Leaders Must Prioritise Three Actions:

  1. Counsellors in Every School: Fix the student-to-counsellor ratio. Make guidance a core function, not a side task.
  2. Early Aptitude Mapping: Begin in primary school. Waiting until Class 12 is too late.
  3. Designed Internships: Embed real-world exposure into the curriculum. Let students experience industries before committing.

Career exploration must become part of everyday learning—not a once-a-year workshop.

Tech as Equaliser: Digital Solutions to the India Career Guidance Crisis

India’s scale and diversity make traditional counselling impractical. But AI-enabled platforms and mobile apps in local languages can democratize access.

As Yasir Ali suggests, these tools can deliver aptitude tests, career updates, and guidance—even to students in remote villages. In my view, tech is the key to solving the India Career Guidance Crisis. A student in rural Bihar deserves the same clarity as one in urban Mumbai.

Technology can also end the information blackout—providing transparency on course costs, institutional quality, and job prospects.

The Call to Action: Structured Direction Is Non-Negotiable

When only 10% of students know what they want to pursue, the India Career Guidance Crisis becomes a productivity crisis. Career guidance must be treated as essential, as critical as math or science.

Boards like CBSE must collaborate with state systems to embed guidance into the curriculum. The goal is simple: move from careers chosen by pressure to careers chosen by fit.

We must retire the 1980s template. We must empower students to explore future-focused sectors.  If we don’t, we condemn another generation to burnout and wasted potential.

Here’s What I Think

The India Career Guidance Crisis is a failure of imagination and investment. We’ve subsidised college seats while ignoring the compass that guides students into them. If 90% drift and only 14% thrive, we’re not just facing a labour shortage—we’re eroding our national mental capital.

I believe the policy debate is too timid. Career counselling must become a mandatory prerequisite for higher education.

The National Grooming Certificate (NGC): A Bold Solution to the India Career Guidance Crisis

India should immediately implement a National Grooming Certificate (NGC), modelled on systems in the UK and Canada.

NGC Requirements:

  • Aptitude Mapping Clearance: Standardised tests via AI-enabled platforms in local languages.
  • Sectoral Exposure: Two mandatory, credit-bearing internships aligned with NEP 2020.
  • Information Literacy Assessment: Proof of understanding course costs, job prospects, and required skills.

No student should enter a degree program without this certificate.

Financing Reform:

Tie funding for career counsellors directly to school accreditation. Move from a 1:1000 ratio to 1:500. Respect guidance the way we respect science.

Cultural Shift:

Fund awareness campaigns about emerging fields—AI, climate tech, and sustainable development. Challenge the parental bias toward outdated professions.

India must treat the India Career Guidance Crisis as a national security issue—not an educational elective. The cost of continued blindness is too high. The time for drift is over. Let’s build a future defined by informed intent.

Talent Wars: Winning the Battle for Top Employees

by 2 Comments

Talent Wars: Winning the Battle for Top Employees

The modern business landscape is fiercely competitive — and not just in terms of products or market share.Equally intense Talent Wars is raging in the realm of human capital: the attraction and retention strategies employed by companies to secure their most valuable asset – their employees.

In my opinion, in this era of rapid technological change and evolving worker expectations, the Talent Wars isn’t merely about offering a paycheck; it’s a multifaceted campaign involving a deep understanding of what truly motivates and engages top performers.

Companies that fail to adapt risk being left behind, their growth stunted by a lack of skilled and dedicated individuals.

Let’s explore the key strategies that forward-thinking organizations are deploying to not only attract but, more importantly, retain the best and brightest in today’s dynamic market.

Talent Wars Strategy 1: Investing in Your People by Improving Talent Progression and Promotion Processes

One of the most powerful magnets for ambitious professionals is the clear promise of growth and advancement within an organization. I believe that companies that actively cultivate their internal talent pool are not just filling future leadership roles; they are sending a strong message that employee contributions are valued and rewarded with opportunities for upward mobility.

As the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2023 points out, improving talent progression and promotion processes is identified by a significant share of organizations as a key business practice to increase talent availability. Isn’t it logical that individuals seeking long-term career success would gravitate towards companies that invest in their employees’ futures?

Consider this: a study by the World Economic Forum in 2024 highlights that improving talent progression and promotion processes is considered a top-three strategy for increasing talent availability across various industries — often outweighing even the lure of higher wages. This suggests a fundamental shift in employee priorities.

While compensation remains important, the opportunity to learn, grow, and take on greater responsibility is a powerful intrinsic motivator. Companies are responding by implementing more transparent promotion pathways, offering mentorship programs, and providing internal mobility opportunities.

In the context of the Talent Wars, organizations increasingly recognize that talent retention is intrinsically linked to career development, and by fostering an environment where employees see a clear trajectory for their professional journey, they are far more likely to stay engaged and committed.

Talent Wars Strategy 2: The Cornerstone of Engagement – Prioritizing Employee Health and Well-being

The traditional view of work often prioritized output above all else — sometimes at the expense of employee well-being. However, the modern Talent Wars demands a more holistic approach.

Companies are increasingly recognizing that a healthy and supported workforce is a more productive and loyal workforce. Supporting employee health and well-being is now a critical talent attraction and retention strategy, as evidenced by its consistent ranking as a top practice for increasing talent availability in the World Economic Forum’s reports.

Think about it: in today’s fast-paced and often stressful work environments, employees are seeking employers who genuinely care about their overall well-being. This goes beyond basic health insurance; it encompasses mental health support, work-life balance initiatives, and a culture that promotes a sustainable pace.

The Future of Jobs Report 2025 even highlights that supporting employee health and well-being is expected to be a top focus for talent attraction, with a significant majority of employers identifying it as a key strategy.

In my opinion, companies that treat their employees as whole individuals, rather than just cogs in a machine, will undoubtedly gain a significant edge in the Talent Wars.

Talent Wars Strategy 3: The Flexible Future – The Rise of Remote and Hybrid Work

The COVID-19 pandemic irrevocably shifted the landscape of work, accelerating the adoption of remote and hybrid models. What was once considered a perk is now, for many, an expectation.

Offering more remote and hybrid work opportunities within countries has emerged as a significant Talent Wars strategy, recognized by a substantial proportion of surveyed organizations in the World Economic Forum’s reports. In some regions, like North America, offering remote and hybrid work opportunities is among the top practices for improving talent availability.

Consider the flexibility and autonomy that remote and hybrid work arrangements provide. Employees can better manage their personal and professional lives, leading to increased job satisfaction and reduced stress.

This flexibility can be particularly attractive to individuals with caregiving responsibilities or those who prefer to avoid long commutes. The Future of Jobs Report 2024 notes that supporting workers with caregiving responsibilities is a growing focus for talent attraction.

By embracing flexible work models, companies can tap into a wider talent pool — a key move in the Talent Wars, especially when traditional office settings limit access to diverse candidates.

Talent Wars Strategy 4: Unleashing Potential by Embracing Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives

In today’s socially conscious world, a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is not just a moral imperative — it’s a strategic advantage in the Talent Wars.

Companies that actively cultivate diverse and inclusive workplaces are not only fostering a more equitable society but also attracting and retaining a wider range of perspectives and talents. More DEI policies and programs are increasingly recognized as a valuable talent attraction and retention strategy.

Think about the richness of ideas and innovation that can emerge from a diverse workforce. Individuals from different backgrounds bring unique experiences and perspectives, leading to more creative problem-solving and a better understanding of diverse customer bases.

The Future of Jobs Report 2025 highlights that employers are increasingly focusing on work experience and psychometric testing over traditional credentials like university degrees — signaling a growing recognition that practical skills and cognitive abilities may be more indicative of future job performance.

In my opinion, companies that actively champion DEI are not just building a better workplace; they are fortifying their positions in the ongoing Talent Wars.

Talent Wars Strategy 5: Investing in Tomorrow’s Skills Through Reskilling and Upskilling

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the skills in demand today may not be the same tomorrow. To win the Talent Wars, companies must not only attract individuals with current skills but also invest in the continuous development of their existing workforce. Providing effective reskilling and upskilling opportunities has become a crucial talent attraction and retention strategy.

Consider the pace of change driven by technologies like AI and big data. The World Economic Forum’s reports consistently emphasize the growing importance of skills in these areas. The Future of Jobs Report 2025 notes that analytical thinking and creative thinking remain the most important skills for workers — and that training workers to utilize AI and big data ranks high among company skills-training priorities. In my opinion, companies that offer reskilling and upskilling programs not only address potential skills gaps but also demonstrate their commitment to employee growth and development. That’s how they stay ahead in the Talent Wars.

Furthermore, public policies that support funding and provision of reskilling and upskilling are seen as crucial for boosting talent availability. This highlights the collaborative effort needed between businesses and governments to create a workforce that is adaptable and future-ready.

Here’s What I Think:

While the strategies outlined above — improving talent progression, prioritizing well-being, embracing flexible work, fostering DEI, and investing in reskilling — are undoubtedly crucial for winning the current Talent Wars, I believe that truly groundbreaking success in attracting and retaining top employees requires a more radical reimagining of the employer-employee relationship.

Talent Ecosystem Partnerships.

Firstly, I advise the concept of Talent Ecosystem Partnerships. Instead of solely focusing on internal development, companies should actively partner with external educational institutions, even competitors (in a non-competitive talent-sharing agreement), and gig economy platforms to create a dynamic ecosystem of talent exchange and development.

Purpose-Driven Benefit Portfolios

Secondly, I envision the rise of Purpose-Driven Benefit Portfolios. Companies should empower employees to customize their benefits based on their values and life stages — deepening their emotional investment in the organization.

Decentralized Skill Ownership.

Thirdly, I believe in the potential of Decentralized Skill Ownership. By enabling employees to direct their own growth through “Skill Stipends” and internal learning platforms, companies can foster a self-sustaining culture of innovation and mastery.

Algorithmic Talent Matching for Growth

Finally, I foresee the evolution of Algorithmic Talent Matching for Growth — internal AI platforms proactively connecting people to career opportunities, internal gigs, and mentors, ensuring that talent is never idle and always evolving.

These divergent ideas, focused on ecosystem partnerships, purpose-driven benefits, decentralized learning, and smart internal mobility, in my opinion, represent the next frontier in the Talent Wars. Companies that adopt them will not only win the war today but build an unshakable foundation for tomorrow.

Sources of insights:

World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025.

Employee Engagement in India: Unlocking a $9.6 Trillion Productivity Powerhouse

by 2 Comments

Employee Engagement in India

The modern workplace often feels like a rapidly shifting landscape, isn’t it? Between technological acceleration, evolving employee expectations, and economic uncertainties, Employee Engagement in India has become a crucial topic for leaders as they grapple with fundamental questions about productivity, resilience, and human potential.

A recent report, Gallup’s “State of the Global Workplace: 2025 Report,” offers a compelling snapshot of this turbulent environment, drawing on the world’s largest ongoing study of the employee experience. It underscores a pivotal moment where employee engagement is flagging precisely as artificial intelligence is poised to reshape industries.

But within this global narrative lies a specific, urgent story about India, a story of significant challenges in employee well-being yet also immense potential for a productivity leap, particularly when focusing on Employee Engagement in India.

The report provides critical insights into how employees perceive their work and their lives, viewing this as an important predictor of organizational resilience and performance. Indeed, when employee engagement faltered globally last year, it carried a hefty price tag, costing the world economy an estimated US$438 billion in lost productivity.

This is not merely an abstract statistic; it represents lost innovation, diminished service, and untapped potential across continents. The sheer scale of this loss begs the question: what if the pendulum swung the other way?

Gallup estimates that achieving full global workplace engagement could inject a staggering US$9.6 trillion in productivity into the world economy, equivalent to 9% of global GDP. Imagine that!

A gain of nearly ten trillion dollars, not from a miraculous technological invention, but from simply enabling people to feel more involved and enthusiastic about their work. This colossal figure highlights the profound connection between human thriving and economic prosperity.

While the report paints a picture of challenges, it also holds “Hope in the Data,” identifying key actions leaders can take to seize this moment.

For a nation like India, with its vast workforce and dynamic economy, understanding and acting on the levers of Employee Engagement in India could be the key to unlocking a significant portion of this global productivity opportunity.

The Global Workplace Landscape and Employee Engagement in India

At its core, employee engagement reflects the involvement and enthusiasm employees feel towards their work and workplace. Engaged employees aren’t just showing up; they are thriving at work, deeply involved, enthusiastic, and demonstrate psychological ownership. They are the engines driving performance and innovation, propelling the organization forward.

Gallup’s measurement of engagement uses a proprietary formula based on the Gallup Q12® items, which are protected by law. This isn’t a simple satisfaction score; it’s a measure tied to specific workplace outcomes. Engaged employees represent a much higher bar than those merely satisfied or who agree with statements.

Globally, the percentage of engaged employees saw a dip, falling from 23% to 21% in 2024. This two-point drop mirrored the decline seen during the year of COVID-19 lockdowns, a stark reminder of the fragility of engagement in the face of disruption.

The report segments the world into various regions for analysis, including South Asia. The South Asia region, as defined by Gallup, includes Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

While the report provides regional averages, it also offers country-specific data for some key metrics within these regions in the appendices. To truly understand Employee Engagement in India, we must look at both the regional context and the specific data points provided for India.

South Asia as a region ranks lower than the global average for engagement, with 26% of employees reported as engaged.

Looking specifically at India, the data shows that 30% of employees are engaged, ranking first within the South Asia region for this metric. This figure is notably higher than the regional average (26%) and the global average (21%), suggesting a relative strength in engagement compared to its neighbours and the world, but it still means a significant majority are not highly involved or enthusiastic.

A Stark Reality Check: Wellbeing and Employee Engagement in India

However, the picture becomes more complex and, frankly, concerning when we look beyond engagement numbers to employee wellbeing and daily emotions.

Gallup’s report categorizes individuals’ life evaluations into three states: thriving, struggling, and suffering. This evaluation is based on a 0-10 ladder scale, where “suffering” is rated at 4 or below for both current and future lives.

Individuals classified as suffering often report miserable lives, lacking basic necessities, and experiencing heightened levels of physical pain, stress, worry, sadness, and anger.

Navigating the Nuances of Suffering and Struggle in South Asia

Some articles in media mentioned that “nearly 90% of Indian employees say they are suffering.” Based on the Gallup’s report, this specific statement about suffering levels in India requires careful qualification.

The report states that the suffering percentage for the South Asia region is 21%. The thriving percentage for the region is 15%, and the struggling percentage is 63%.

If we combine the struggling and suffering categories for South Asia, we get 84% (63% struggling + 21% suffering). This 84% figure represents employees who are not thriving and is indeed close to “nearly 90%,” but it encompasses both struggling and suffering individuals, not just suffering ones.

The report does provide a specific thriving rate for India, which is 17%. However, it does not explicitly break down the struggling and suffering percentages for India specifically, separating them from the broader South Asia regional data.

Therefore, the claim that nearly 90% of Indian employees are suffering is not directly supported by the provided data.

The data does show that a very large percentage (84%) of employees in the South Asia region (which includes India) are classified as either struggling or suffering. While we don’t have the precise split for India, the regional data indicates a significant well-being challenge, with 21% suffering and 63% struggling.

This paints a picture where a substantial majority (84%) are not experiencing the best possible life according to the life evaluation scale used.

This high percentage of non-thriving employees in the region is a critical context when discussing Employee Engagement in India.

The Pervasiveness of Sadness and Other Emotions

Beyond the life evaluation, the report probes daily emotional experiences. And here, the data for India and South Asia presents a stark picture.

Globally, 23% of employees reported experiencing sadness a lot of the previous day. The South Asia region stands out grimly in this regard, ranking highest regionally for the percentage of employees experiencing daily sadness, at 39%.

Looking specifically at India, the percentage of employees who reported experiencing sadness a lot of the previous day is also 39%. This figure is indeed very close to “over 40%,” highlighting a significant prevalence of sadness among the Indian workforce according to this data.

South Asia also ranks highest regionally for the percentage of employees experiencing daily anger, at 34%.

For India specifically, the figure for daily anger is also 34%, placing it second within the region for this emotion.

Stress is another common emotion experienced by employees globally. While South Asia’s regional stress level is 31%, below the global average of 40%, India’s specific stress figure is also 31%.

Loneliness is also measured, with the South Asia regional figure standing at 29%, and India’s specific figure is also 29%.

In summary, while India shows a relatively higher engagement rate compared to the regional and global averages, the data on life evaluation and daily emotions reveals a troubling reality for many employees in India and the broader South Asia region.

The region has the lowest percentage of thriving employees globally (15%) and the highest percentage of daily anger and sadness.

India’s figures for sadness (39%), anger (34%), stress (31%), and loneliness (29%) underscore significant emotional challenges faced by its workforce.

This disconnect between relatively higher engagement and pervasive negative emotions and low well-being is a fascinating, albeit concerning, dynamic that merits deep consideration when discussing Employee Engagement in India.

How can employees be engaged if so many are struggling or suffering and experiencing high levels of negative emotions? It suggests that while some aspects of the work experience might foster involvement, the overall life and emotional context for many is incredibly challenging.

Connecting Wellbeing, Employee Engagement in India, and the Productivity Puzzle

The Gallup report emphasizes that employee engagement is a key predictor of organizational resilience and performance. It’s logical, isn’t it? If employees are enthusiastic and involved, they’re more likely to go the extra mile, collaborate effectively, and contribute positively to the bottom line.

Conversely, when employees are struggling or suffering and experiencing high levels of negative emotions, their ability to be productive, innovative, and resilient is undoubtedly compromised.

The Cost of Disengagement

The global loss of US$438 billion in productivity due to falling employee engagement is a stark reminder of the economic consequences of a disengaged workforce. Disengaged employees may be physically present but psychologically absent. They might do the bare minimum, lack creativity, or even actively work against the organization’s goals (classified as actively disengaged). This lack of motivation and connection translates directly into inefficiencies, errors, lower quality, and decreased output.

In a large and rapidly developing economy like India, the potential productivity loss from struggling, suffering, and disengaged employees is immense.

While India’s engagement rate is higher than the global average, the high prevalence of negative emotions and low thriving levels suggest that even among those categorized as “engaged” or “not engaged,” there might be significant underlying well-being issues impacting their full potential.

Employees grappling with constant sadness, anger, stress, or loneliness are less likely to be operating at their peak, regardless of their formal engagement category.

The human cost of this is immeasurable, but the economic cost, while harder to pinpoint specifically for India from the provided report, is undoubtedly substantial.

The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity

This is where the narrative shifts from challenge to opportunity. Gallup’s estimate of a US$9.6 trillion global productivity boost from full engagement isn’t just a theoretical maximum; it’s a target that highlights the untapped potential residing within the workforce. If organizations globally could reach even 70% engagement (a level already achieved by some best-practice organizations), the economic gains would be enormous.

For India, a nation aiming for higher economic growth, unlocking this productivity powerhouse through improved Employee Engagement in India and enhanced wellbeing presents a transformative opportunity.

Addressing the high levels of sadness and struggle isn’t just a humanitarian imperative; it’s an economic necessity. A workforce that feels better, both about their lives and their work, will inherently be more dynamic, creative, and productive.

The report indicates that improvements in engagement and well-being can indeed lead to higher productivity and profitability across various industries and cultures.

Imagine the collective power unleashed if the sadness and struggle seen in the data were significantly reduced, freeing up mental and emotional energy for focused, enthusiastic work.

The Linchpin: Managers and Employee Engagement in India

How does an organization, or even a nation, pivot from pervasive struggle and negative emotions towards higher engagement and thriving? The Gallup report points to a critical factor: managers.

Why Managers Matter So Much

The relationship between managers and their teams is incredibly powerful. Engaged employees tend to be more productive, absent less, build better customer relationships, and close more sales. And what factor most engages work teams? Their manager.

The report explicitly states that if managers are disengaged, their teams are likely to be disengaged too, a relationship strong enough to show up in country-level data. If manager engagement declines, the ripple effect on overall employee engagement and global workplace productivity is a significant risk.

This makes intuitive sense, doesn’t it? Managers are on the front lines. They set expectations, provide rereport, offer recognition, facilitate development, and ideally, show care for their team members.

They are the primary channel through which organizational culture and values are experienced by individual contributors. A great manager can buffer a challenging work environment, while a poor manager can make even a good job unbearable.

Investing in Manager Development: A Path to Better Employee Engagement in India

Given the pivotal role managers play, the report highlights manager development as a key action for leaders seeking to improve engagement and well-being. Less than half of the world’s managers (44%) report receiving management training. The decline in manager development globally is concerning, with most managers indicating they haven’t received training for their roles.

However, the data offers compelling evidence for the impact of training. The report reveals that among managers who receive training, half as many are actively disengaged compared to untrained managers. This suggests that even basic training in role responsibilities can prevent managers from feeling overwhelmed (“drowning”). Furthermore, manager training focused on best practices can significantly boost performance metrics (20% to 28%) and improve employee engagement on their teams (up to 18%).

Crucially, manager development is also a powerful lever for improving manager wellbeing. Providing manager training alone increases manager thriving levels from 28% to 34%. But if managers not only receive training but are also actively encouraged in their development by someone at work, their thriving rate jumps to a remarkable 50%. Considering the impact managers have on their teams’ wellbeing, investing in manager training and development emerges as one of the most effective “wellbeing initiatives” employers can pursue.

For India, where managers in South Asia have the highest engagement rate (37%) compared to individual contributors (20%) in the region, but still operate within a context of low overall well-being and high negative emotions, focusing on equipping these managers is paramount.

Empowered, well-trained managers are better positioned to support their teams, foster a positive environment, and directly influence both Employee Engagement in India and the overall well-being of the workforce.

By investing in managers, organizations in India can not only improve their immediate team dynamics but also contribute to the broader national goal of unlocking greater productivity.

Charting a Course for Enhanced Employee Engagement in India

The path forward, as suggested by the Gallup report and illuminated by the data points for India and South Asia, seems clear, though certainly not easy. It requires a deliberate, data-informed strategy centred on improving the human experience at work.

Leaders in India must acknowledge the high levels of sadness, anger, stress, and struggle indicated by the data. These aren’t minor issues; they represent a workforce carrying a significant emotional burden, which inevitably impacts their ability to thrive and contribute fully.

Prioritizing Employee Engagement in India means going beyond superficial perks or satisfaction surveys. It means delving into the core elements of the Gallup Q12 framework, ensuring employees know what’s expected, have the right tools, feel they can do what they do best, receive recognition, feel cared for, see development opportunities, feel their opinions matter, connect to the company’s mission, work with committed colleagues, have workplace friendships, discuss their progress, and have opportunities to learn and grow.

Critically, it means investing heavily in managers. Providing comprehensive training and ongoing development for managers is not just an HR initiative; it’s a strategic business imperative with the potential to significantly boost engagement, performance, and well-being, thereby contributing to the massive global productivity opportunity highlighted by Gallup. Rethinking the manager’s role, expectations, and support systems is key.

The report concludes with a call to action for executives: invest in the future of management or risk the consequences of inaction. For India, a country on the cusp of significant economic growth, this message resonates profoundly. Addressing the wellbeing challenges and actively fostering Employee Engagement in India is not just about catching up; it’s about leading the way towards a future where productivity is fueled by human potential, not despite its struggles, but because those struggles are actively acknowledged and addressed.

Here’s What I Think

Based on the compelling data from the Gallup report and the specific context of India, I believe the situation presents a unique inflexion point.

While the high rates of sadness and struggle are undeniably concerning, they also highlight a massive area for potential improvement and subsequent productivity gains.

My take is that simply implementing standard management training, while necessary and impactful as the report suggests, might not be sufficient to address the depth of the well-being challenges indicated for the South Asia region and India. We need more radical, culturally attuned interventions.

First, I think organizations in India should consider building wellbeing support directly into the management structure, perhaps appointing “Wellbeing Champions” within teams or providing managers with specialized training in mental health first aid and emotional intelligence, going beyond typical management best practices. This would equip managers to not only improve engagement but also to recognize and support employees struggling with the high levels of sadness and stress reported.

Second, I believe there’s a significant opportunity to leverage technology in innovative ways that weren’t explicitly detailed in the report’s AI discussion. Imagine AI-powered tools designed to provide confidential mental health support and coping strategies tailored to the specific cultural context, accessible directly to employees.

This could bypass potential social stigmas associated with seeking help and offer immediate, personalized support, addressing the reported sadness and stress head-on. Furthermore, could AI analytics be used to identify early indicators of team stress or disengagement before they manifest as significant problems, allowing for proactive managerial intervention?

Third, I think the focus needs to shift beyond just the employer. Given the high levels of struggle and suffering reported regionally, there’s a role for broader societal and governmental initiatives. Could government-backed campaigns promote mental well-being in the workplace, providing accessible rereport, or even incentivizing companies that demonstrate significant improvements in employee well-being metrics, not just engagement? A national dialogue about the human cost of the current work environment, backed by data like this, seems crucial.

Finally, I believe fostering genuine workplace friendships (“I have a best friend at work” is a Q12 item) is more critical than ever, especially given the reported loneliness.

In increasingly remote or hybrid work models, intentional efforts to build social connections – perhaps through structured team-building activities focused purely on human connection rather than task completion – could counteract the feelings of isolation and significantly boost both well-being and engagement.

This might seem simple, but sometimes, the most impactful solutions are rooted in fundamental human needs.

The path to unlocking India’s productivity powerhouse is paved with prioritizing the human element, with innovative, empathetic, and culturally sensitive strategies that tackle the deep-seated challenges revealed by this report.

Sources of Insight:

  1. Gallup: State of the Global Workplace

Global Skills Gap: A Looming Challenge for Talent Acquisition

by Leave a Comment

Decoding the Global Skills Gap

The world is in constant change, isn’t it? Technological advancements are reshaping industries at breakneck speed, and amidst this whirlwind of innovation, a critical issue continues to cast a long shadow: the global skills gap. This pervasive mismatch between the skills employers need and the skills the workforce possesses isn’t just a minor inconvenience; it’s a major barrier to business transformation globally. As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, understanding and addressing this gap has become paramount for successful talent acquisition and sustained organizational growth.

Global Skills Gap: Identifying the Skills That Matter in Today’s Demand Landscape

So, what exactly are these elusive skills that businesses are clamou ring for? The reports paint a clear picture of a rapidly evolving demand landscape. Leading the charge is the relentless rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its various iterations, most notably Generative AI (GenAI). The launch of ChatGPT in 2022 ignited a global race toward AI literacy, and the numbers speak volumes: global GenAI course enrollments on platforms like Coursera witnessed an astounding 1,060% year-over-year increase. This surge underscores how learners are actively preparing for AI’s transformative impact on their careers. From prompt engineering for ChatGPT to introductory courses on GenAI, the appetite for foundational AI skills is undeniable.

But it’s not just about creating AI; it’s also about protecting the digital realm it inhabits. With a 75% surge in cyberattacks in Q3 2024 and the increasing sophistication of these threats, cybersecurity skills have surged into the fastest-growing skills list. In my opinion, this isn’t surprising. As businesses become increasingly reliant on digital infrastructure and generate massive amounts of data (a significant portion of which, alarmingly, isn’t even being backed up), the demand for professionals who can identify, neutralize, and respond to threats is only going to escalate. This urgency is further amplified by a nearly five-million-person shortage of cyber professionals globally.

Beyond the cutting edge of AI and the crucial domain of cybersecurity, a broader spectrum of tech skills remains in high demand. This includes fundamental aspects like network planning & design and the use of Security Information & Event Management (SIEM) to bolster security posture. Furthermore, technological literacy itself is becoming a core expectation across more than 9 in 10 jobs, encompassing everything from basic computer usage to more advanced digital proficiencies.

Interestingly, the “soft” skills, often referred to as human skills, are gaining even greater prominence in this AI-augmented world. While machines take on repetitive and analytical tasks, employers are increasingly seeking individuals who possess emotional intelligence, creativity, negotiation, active listening, empathy, and persuasive communication.

Analytical thinking consistently ranks as the most sought-after core skill, along with resilience, flexibility, agility, leadership and social influence, and creative thinking. As AI becomes more integrated into the workplace, these human qualities become key differentiators, ensuring ethical decision-making and effective collaboration in diverse teams.

In the business domain, beyond general communication and risk mitigation, there’s a growing emphasis on human rereports (HR) technology, reflecting the need for tech-savvy HR professionals to manage talent in a digital age. Furthermore, sustainability skills like waste management and business continuity planning are increasingly prioritized, particularly by younger generations concerned about climate change.

Global Skills Gap: Regional Rhythms and Variations in Skill Demand Worldwide

The global skills gap isn’t a monolithic entity; it pulsates with regional variations, each with its unique rhythm of demand and availability. In Latin America and the Caribbean, there’s evidence of improved technical skill rankings. Countries like Colombia and Mexico are seeing high engagement in GenAI courses, while learners in Peru focus on skills like culture and resilience.

Europe, despite its commitment to digital transformation and the development of the AI Act, faces a significant hurdle: 70% of European businesses view the lack of digital skills as a major obstacle to investment, and a staggering 40% of adults lack even basic digital skills. This digital deficit needs urgent attention to fully capitalize on the region’s ambitious Digital Decade goals.

Across the Asia Pacific, CEOs are accelerating AI investments, leading to a surge in AI and cybersecurity course enrollments. However, the region faces the monumental challenge of digitally skilling 5.7 billion people by 2025. While Singapore strategically focuses on future-oriented skills like blockchain and machine learning, supported by initiatives like the SkillsFuture credits program, other countries like Bangladesh, Myanmar, and the Philippines still exhibit noticeable gaps in tech and data science skills.

In South-Eastern Asia, employers are heavily focused on upskilling their existing workforce. India, with its rapidly expanding digital access, sees increased demand for Big Data Specialists and AI and Machine Learning Specialists.

Sub-Saharan Africa grapples with significant transformation barriers, including widespread skills gaps. In South Africa, while there’s potential for significant job creation in the digital sector, a pressing need exists to develop a skilled domestic workforce in digital and ICT. Learners are focusing on business skills relevant to roles like IT project manager and operations manager, with mobile devices being the primary mode of learning. Nigeria anticipates network and cybersecurity skills to be among the fastest-growing in demand as it develops its Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) industry.

Even in developed economies like North America, where the focus is on developing a skilled and inclusive workforce, challenges persist. In the United States, despite a focus on technical skills like SQL and Python, nearly one-third of US workers lack foundational digital skills, disproportionately affecting workers of colour. The growing need for STEM professionals also outpaces the number of graduates in engineering and computer science. Canada sees learners focusing on a diverse range of skills, from technical to communication-focused, like storytelling and social media.

In the Middle East and North Africa, a strong year-over-year enrollment growth in GenAI courses signals a growing interest in AI and machine learning. Turkey, for example, must reskill a significant portion of its workforce to meet future demands, with learners over-indexing in machine learning algorithms.

These regional nuances underscore a critical point for global talent acquisition strategies: a one-size-fits-all approach simply won’t cut it. Understanding these diverse demands and availability is crucial for organizations seeking to build globally competitive teams.

Global Skills Gap: The Indispensable Role of Continuous Learning and Upskilling

Given the rapid pace of technological change and the evolving demands of the job market, the necessity of continuous learning and upskilling cannot be overstated. For employees to remain competitive and for organizations to thrive, a commitment to lifelong learning is no longer a luxury; it’s a fundamental requirement.

The reports indicate that employers recognize this imperative. A significant 85% of employers surveyed plan to prioritize upskilling their workforce. This investment in workforce development and micro-credentials is driven by the fact that 65% of companies report talent shortages. Looking ahead to 2030, a substantial portion of the global workforce will require reskilling and upskilling to adapt to changing roles and the integration of new technologies.

I believe this proactive approach to learning is essential. Organizations that foster a culture of continuous learning empower their employees, enhance their agility, and ultimately secure their future success. This involves developing comprehensive learning programs that engage, retain, and develop employees.

Furthermore, governments have a vital role to play in building comprehensive skills development programs that equip job seekers with the skills critical for employment and economic growth.

Higher education institutions, too, must adapt by delivering industry-aligned curricula that attract students and improve their employability. The rise of online learning platforms like Coursera plays a crucial role in making high-quality learning accessible to a global audience. The blended learning model, combining online and in-person elements, is increasingly recognized as a highly effective approach.

Bridging the Divide: Talent Acquisition Strategies for a Skills-Scarce World

How can organizations effectively navigate this landscape of skills gaps and talent shortages? Traditional talent acquisition methods may no longer be sufficient. A shift in mindset and strategy is needed.

One crucial approach is hiring for potential rather than solely for existing skills. By focusing on adaptability, problem-solving abilities, and a growth mindset, organizations can tap into a wider talent pool and invest in on-the-job training to bridge specific skill gaps. This also involves creating more gig-based work to encourage versatile skill-building and enterprise-wide talent sharing.

The reports also highlight the growing importance of skills-based hiring, with some companies planning to remove degree requirements to expand their talent pool and improve skills matching. This signifies a recognition that practical skills and competencies can be more indicative of future job performance than formal educational qualifications. Skills assessments and psychometric tests are also gaining traction as methods for evaluating candidates’ abilities and potential.

Furthermore, organizations are increasingly looking to tap into diverse talent pools and implement targeted recruitment, retention, and progression initiatives. Supporting employee health and well-being is also emerging as a key focus for talent attraction and retention. In my opinion, fostering a sense of belonging and celebrating employee contributions are also vital elements in attracting and retaining top talent.

The adoption of AI-driven talent insights can significantly enhance strategic workforce planning. Using AI to guide entry-level candidates through the hiring process, as some companies are doing, can reduce time-to-hire and free up recruiters for more strategic work. However, it’s crucial to establish AI governance and training for the workforce to ensure responsible and ethical use of these technologies.

Global Skills Gap: The Power of Partnership for a Skilled Future

Ultimately, addressing the global skills gap requires a concerted effort and strong collaboration between industry, education, and government. Businesses need to clearly articulate their evolving skill needs, while educational institutions must adapt their curricula to align with these demands. Governments play a crucial role in investing in skills development programs, supporting reskilling and upskilling initiatives, and creating an environment conducive to lifelong learning.

The development of global skills taxonomies is also a significant step towards enabling better communication and comparability of skills data across countries. While creating a universal taxonomy presents challenges, advancements in machine learning and natural language processing are making this goal more attainable.

Realizing skill development solutions requires robust innovation and collaboration between key actors. By working together, these stakeholders can create a more agile and responsive education and training ecosystem that effectively equips the workforce with the critical skills needed for today and the future.

Here’s What I Think.

In conclusion, while global trends highlight the imperative of digital skills and lifelong learning for navigating an AI-driven future, the Indian context presents a unique set of opportunities and challenges that necessitate a significantly different approach.

The existing discourse often revolves around skilling Indian graduates for the current demands of the IT sector and the evolving technological landscape. However, given India’s demographic dividend and the specific nuances of its job market, a more radical and future-forward perspective is needed.

Instead of solely focusing on bridging the immediate skill gaps identified in reports like India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025, we could envision a future where India leverages its youthful demographic to pioneer a model of ‘distributed expertise networks’.

Imagine platforms that move beyond traditional employment, enabling graduates with specific skills, even micro-skills honed through accessible online rereports, to contribute to projects on a fractional basis across numerous organizations, both within India and globally.

These networks could be powered by AI-driven skill-matching algorithms that go beyond static resumes, dynamically assessing and deploying talent based on real-time project needs and individual competency demonstrated through verifiable digital credentials and project portfolios.

This would address the issue of underemployment by allowing graduates to gain diverse experience and earn based on their actual skills contribution, rather than solely on a fixed job role.

Furthermore, rather than solely relying on formal educational institutions to adapt their curricula, India could foster the growth of hyper-localized, community-driven ‘skill guilds’.

These decentralized learning ecosystems would focus on practical, hands-on training in rapidly evolving technologies, facilitated by industry experts and leveraging vernacular languages to overcome digital literacy barriers highlighted in the adaptation of O*NET in Indonesia.

Imagine government-backed ‘skill tokens’ that individuals can use to access these guild-based learning opportunities, fostering a culture of continuous and relevant upskilling directly tied to local industry needs and emerging opportunities beyond the traditional urban hubs. This could address the challenge of varying employability across states and college tiers by democratizing access to quality, relevant skills training.

Finally, to truly diverge from conventional models, India could champion the concept of ‘empathy-driven innovation hubs’, leveraging the emphasis on soft skills alongside technical abilities.

These hubs would encourage graduates, particularly from Tier 2 and Tier 3 colleges, to focus on using AI and emerging technologies to solve uniquely Indian challenges in areas like agriculture, healthcare, and sustainable development, emphasizing ethical considerations and social impact.

Imagine government and corporate funding directed towards ‘reverse innovation challenges’, where young graduates are incentivized to develop AI-powered solutions for grassroots problems, fostering not just job creation but also impactful societal transformation.

Sources of insights:

  1. Coursera’s Job-Skills-Report-2025
  2. Global skills gaps measurement-ILO
  3. India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025
  4. WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025
  5. Global Talent Trends 2024-2025 

Gen Z Employability in India: Decoding Why Indian Companies Are Hesitant to Hire

by 3 Comments

Gen Z Employability in India: Decoding Why Indian Companies Are Hesitant to Hire

India is home to the world’s largest youth population, yet the promise of this demographic dividend is clouded by a growing challenge—Gen Z employability in India. As fresh graduates enter the workforce brimming with ambition and digital fluency, companies across sectors are grappling with a shared hesitation: are they truly ready for the world of work? Let’s explore the real reasons behind this reluctance and what it will take to bridge the employability divide.

The Gen Z Employability India Puzzle: Promise vs. Perception

The Indian demographic dividend, often touted as its greatest strength, presents a fascinating paradox in today’s job market. Millions of young graduates enter the workforce each year, brimming with potential and digital fluency. Yet, a significant disconnect persists, with many Indian companies expressing hesitation or even dissatisfaction with their recent Gen Z hires. Graduate Hiring Trends in India further highlight this disconnect, as businesses grapple with aligning recruitment strategies to meet the expectations and capabilities of the younger workforce.

Could it be a matter of mismatched expectations, an outdated hiring playbook, or perhaps a deeper issue rooted in the evolving dynamics of work and the aspirations of this new generation?

What Indian Employers Are Really Saying About Gen Z Employability

The Unstop Talent Report 2025 offers a compelling perspective on this evolving landscape. It highlights the “discrepancies between student aspirations and employer practices”, suggesting a fundamental misalignment in how both sides perceive the world of work. Over the past year, Unstop engaged with over 700 human resource leaders and more than 30,000 Gen Z individuals across campuses to understand these shifts.

Their findings paint a picture of a generation ready to transform the workplace, akin to a “pawn” in chess with the potential to become the strongest piece “if it’s played right”. The crucial question then becomes: are Indian companies setting up Gen Z to win, or are they keeping them stuck in the opening game with outdated strategies? This mindset reveals the internal doubt businesses have when betting on younger talent, a major hindrance to Gen Z employability in India.

Skill Gaps Hindering Gen Z Employability in India

One significant piece of this puzzle lies in the persistent skills gap in the Indian context. For years, reports have highlighted the challenges faced by Indian graduates in meeting industry demands. The “Beyond Degrees” MSN article pointed out that over 80 percent of Indian engineers are “unfit for jobs in the knowledge economy due to a lack of new-age skills”.

This isn’t just about technical prowess; it extends to crucial soft skills necessary to thrive in today’s dynamic workplaces. India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025 reinforces this, revealing an overall drop in graduate employability from 44.3% in 2023 to 42.6% in 2024, particularly driven by a decline in non-technical skills.

While employability in technical roles saw an increase, this suggests that while Gen Z might be digitally native, the traditional education system may still be struggling to equip them with the holistic skillset employers prioritize. Recruiters themselves acknowledge this struggle, with 63% reporting that their biggest hiring challenge isn’t just finding talent, but finding talent that’s job-ready due to skill gaps. These skill gaps remain one of the biggest challenges to Gen Z employability in India.

Feedback, Flexibility & Friction: Gen Z’s Workplace Expectations

Adding another layer of complexity is the clash of expectations between Gen Z and traditional Indian employer practices. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 sheds light on several key areas of divergence. Take feedback, for example. A staggering 77% of Gen Z professionals prefer monthly or project-based reviews, advocating for “fast iterations” and “quick course corrections”.

In stark contrast, 71% of recruiters still adhere to traditional check-ins like annual, biannual, and quarterly reviews. This “feedback delayed” approach represents a significant “generational divide”, as Gen Z seeks real-time input to facilitate their growth and development. As the report aptly notes, “No one likes surprises”.

When Gen Z’s expectations clash with legacy processes, it creates friction—and many employers interpret this as a lack of professionalism or resilience, impacting perceptions around Gen Z employability in India.

The Rise of Side Hustles and the Shifting Definition of Employability

Furthermore, Gen Z’s aspirations extend beyond a singular, conventional career path. A significant 51% of Gen Z individuals want to build multiple income streams through side hustles, freelancing, and other gigs. Among B-School graduates, this figure jumps even higher to 59%.

Career Motivation Redefined: What Gen Z Truly Values

This desire for diverse income sources reflects a generation that refuses to “put all its eggs in one basket”, prioritizing career security beyond just landing a single job. This contrasts with the traditional expectation of full-time commitment that many Indian companies still hold dear. If companies fail to align with these aspirations, they risk being left behind in the Gen Z employability in India race.

What Gen Z Wants: Career Growth Over Fancy Titles

Career priorities also differ. While salary is undoubtedly important (55% of Gen Z cite competitive salary as a factor), professional growth (79%) and gaining new skills and experiences (72%) top their list of what matters most. They seek careers that offer growth, purpose, and real impact.

Gen Z isn’t just chasing fancy titles; they prioritize financial growth, with 71% of premier B-School students preferring a pay raise over a promotion. This suggests that companies need to rethink their “raise vs. rank” strategies to align with what truly motivates this generation.

Campus to Cubicle: What’s Missing in India’s Early Careers Pipeline

The evolving engagement strategies of Gen Z also present a challenge for Indian recruiters stuck in their traditional ways. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 highlights a significant “engagement gap”.

A remarkable 70% of Gen Z individuals actively engage in case studies, ideathons, quizzes, and simulations. They see these as “auditions for top talent” and a “platform to sharpen their skills”. Companies that run such competitions not only hire faster but also hire better.

Yet, a mere 25% of recruiters prefer these methods as their primary strategy to engage talent. Instead, recruiters are still heavily reliant on social media campaigns (42%), placement talks (17%), and leadership lectures (4%), which, while having their place, clearly don’t resonate as strongly with Gen Z as interactive and experience-based engagement. A more proactive approach to early career branding could dramatically boost Gen Z employability in India.

Mental Health, Professionalism & Readiness: Unpacking Gen Z Realities

Concerns regarding preparedness and professionalism also contribute to this hesitation. The Intelligent.com survey revealed that a significant majority (75%) of companies reported that some or all of the recent college graduates they hired this year were unsatisfactory. Furthermore, 6 in 10 companies even fired a recent college graduate within the same year.

Hiring managers cited reasons such as being unprepared for the workforce, struggling to handle the workload, and exhibiting unprofessional behaviour. These are serious concerns that Indian companies might also share.

It can be easy to fall into “typical stereotypes of Gen Z”, but I believe it’s crucial to avoid generalizations. Companies also bear a significant responsibility to provide formal employee onboarding programs that clearly outline company culture and expectations.

Gen Z Anxiety: The Hidden Force Behind ‘Unreadiness’

The Unstop Talent Report 2025 also touches upon the “readiness riddle”, acknowledging that even those who feel ready for the workforce harbour anxieties, with 40% of Gen Zs fearing they won’t land a job in their preferred field and 33% stressing about not making enough money.

This anxiety can sometimes manifest as a perceived lack of preparedness or commitment. However, as the report emphasizes, the new way to hire isn’t just about skills anymore; “it’s also about understanding the talent’s mindset”. These are signals of a generation grappling with overwhelming transitions and a new definition of “work.” Understanding these realities is crucial to improving Gen Z employability in India.

Preparing for the Future: Gen Z Employability in an AI-Driven India

Furthermore, the evolving landscape of the job market, heavily influenced by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation, adds another dimension to Gen Z employability in India.

India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025 highlights the increasing importance of skills needed to work in an AI-augmented world. While technical proficiency in AI and data analytics is becoming fundamental, the report also stresses the crucial role of soft skills like communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence.

From Prestige to Potential: The Rise of the Skills-First Hiring Mindset

Interestingly, the Unstop Talent Report 2025 reveals that “premier college tags do not have any impact on 73% of recruiters”. This signifies a welcome shift towards talent over tags and a prioritization of skills that align with industry demands.

Recruiters are increasingly valuing communication and interpersonal skills (72%), problem-solving and critical thinking (59%), and adaptability and flexibility (56%) above academic pedigree.

The New Talent Champions: How Startups and Product Firms Are Leading the Way

The report also highlights the growing prominence of next-gen companies like E-commerce, Startups, and Product companies, which now account for 25% of offers. These companies are often perceived as offering more “dynamic and skill-based roles”, appealing to young professionals who prioritize growth and flexibility over traditional corporate structures.

Here’s What I Think:

The current hesitation towards Gen Z employability in India, as highlighted by these reports, feels like a critical juncture. Simply bridging the existing gaps in skills and expectations, while necessary, isn’t enough for a truly transformative shift. I believe we need to fundamentally reimagine the talent acquisition and development landscape to create a symbiotic relationship between Indian companies and Gen Z.

Innovating Employability: Bold Ideas to Empower Gen Z in India

  • Immersive, Industry-Integrated Education Hubs: Instead of relying solely on traditional universities, India could establish specialized “Industry Integration Hubs.” These wouldn’t just offer degrees but would be deeply embedded within key industries. Gen Z students would spend significant time within companies, working on real-world projects from day one. The curriculum would be co-designed by industry leaders, ensuring that graduates possess precisely the skills and mindset required.
    This would directly address the skills gap and provide companies with a pipeline of job-ready talent who are already familiar with their culture and challenges. The focus keyword, Gen Z employability India, would be organically integrated into the very fabric of these hubs.
  • “Micro-Mentorship Networks” Fueled by AI: Instead of traditional one-on-one mentorship, imagine AI-powered platforms that create dynamic “micro-mentorship networks.” Gen Z employees could connect with multiple senior professionals across different departments and even companies for specific, project-based guidance. AI would analyze skill gaps and career aspirations to suggest relevant mentors and facilitate targeted knowledge transfer.
    This addresses the need for frequent feedback and diverse perspectives that Gen Z values, moving beyond the limitations of a single mentor. This agile and personalized approach would significantly enhance Gen Z employability in India by providing continuous, relevant support.
  • “Skill-as-a-Service” Talent Platforms: Companies could move away from the traditional full-time employment model for entry-level Gen Z talent and embrace “Skill-as-a-Service” platforms. These platforms would connect companies with Gen Z professionals for specific projects or short-term engagements based purely on their demonstrated skills.
    This caters to Gen Z’s desire for multiple income streams and allows companies to access niche skills without long-term commitment. Performance on these projects would build a verifiable skill portfolio, enhancing Gen Z employability in India and providing a more fluid talent market.
  • Gamified “Culture Assimilation Simulators”: To address concerns about professionalism and cultural fit, companies could develop gamified virtual reality or augmented reality “Culture Assimilation Simulators.” New Gen Z hires would navigate realistic workplace scenarios, receive instant feedback on their interactions, and learn the nuances of the company culture in an engaging and low-stakes environment.
    This proactive approach to cultural onboarding would equip Gen Z with the soft skills needed to thrive, directly impacting Gen Z employability India by fostering smoother integration.
  • “Reverse Innovation Fellowships” Led by Gen Z: Recognizing Gen Z’s digital fluency and fresh perspectives, companies could institute “Reverse Innovation Fellowships.” Instead of senior leaders mentoring juniors, Gen Z fellows would lead projects focused on digital transformation, innovative marketing strategies, or understanding emerging consumer trends.
    This not only empowers Gen Z but also provides established companies with invaluable insights and helps bridge the generational gap in understanding, ultimately boosting Gen Z employability in India by showcasing their potential for leadership and innovation.

These ideas move beyond incremental improvements and propose a fundamental shift in how India educates, connects, and integrates its Gen Z workforce. By embracing innovation and understanding the unique aspirations of this generation, India can truly leverage its demographic dividend and transform the perceived wariness into an enthusiastic embrace, leading to a significant boost in Gen Z employability in India.

We don’t need to fix Gen Z. We need to fix the systems trying to employ them.

Sources of Insights:

  1. Unstop Talent Report 2025
  2. India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025
  3. The Future of Jobs Report 2025
  4. Mercer | Mettl’s : “India’s Graduate Skill Index 2025″
  5. Beyond degrees: Why prac􀆟cal skills mater more in today’s job market
  6. Intelligent.com.. (2023, December 12). Nearly 4 in 10 employers avoid hiring recent college grads in favor of older workers. Retrieved from Intelligent.com

Early Talent Engagement: The Knight’s Move in Hiring to Secure Top Talent Before Placement Season Begins

by 1 Comment

Early Talent Engagement: The Knight’s Move in Hiring to Secure Top Talent Before Placement Season Begins

In the intricate game of chess, the knight moves in a unique “L” shape – an unexpected manoeuvre that allows it to leap over other pieces and land in a strategic position. Similarly, in the dynamic arena of hiring, those who execute the Early Talent Engagement strategy make a non-linear move, positioning themselves to win the best candidates long before their competitors even realize the game has truly begun.

Have you ever wondered why some companies consistently secure top-tier talent while others scramble during placement season, often settling for second best? The answer, I believe, lies in their proactive approach. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 paints a clear picture: in the hiring game, if you do not adapt, you lose. Traditional hiring models, heavily reliant on placement season activities, are showing cracks. The rules have changed, and the new currency is skills, adaptability, and real-world readiness. Early Talent Engagement isn’t just a trend; it’s a power move that winning recruiters are leveraging to gain a significant upper hand.

Early Talent Engagement: The Placement Season Predicament- Why Waiting is Losing

Think about the traditional placement season. It’s a period of intense competition, where numerous companies descend upon campuses, vying for the attention of graduating students. But by then, the best talent often already has options. They’ve connected with companies that have made an effort to engage with them earlier, leaving those who waited until the last minute to compete for a potentially smaller and less engaged talent pool. As the report aptly puts it, you are either top of mind for students before they enter the job market, or you are competing for what’s left. It’s like waiting for the best fruit to ripen on its own while your competitors are actively tending to their orchards.

Consider this: a grandmaster’s playbook is not built in a day. Similarly, a winning talent pipeline isn’t forged overnight. It requires consistent effort, strategic interactions, and a genuine interest in nurturing relationships with potential candidates long before they are actively seeking employment. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 is built on raw voices and real stories from the next generation, gathered through conversations with over 700 human resource leaders and 30,000+ Gen Zs. Their insights reveal a clear preference for companies that engage early and meaningfully.

The Knight’s Move Advantage: Benefits of Early Talent Engagement

So, what separates the recruiters who win early through Early Talent Engagement from those stuck making last-minute moves? It’s the understanding that the game begins before the first formal move – before the job postings even go live. Engaging early offers a multitude of benefits:

  • Access to a Wider Talent Pool: By connecting with students early, you tap into a pool of individuals who might not even be actively looking yet but are open to exploring opportunities with companies that resonate with them. This allows you to identify and cultivate relationships with high-potential candidates before the intense competition of placement season begins.
  • Building Employer Brand Recognition and Affinity: Early Talent Engagement provides a platform to showcase your company culture, values, and growth opportunities. Meaningful touchpoints, such as company-led competitions, job/internship openings on job boards (even for future roles), and employee stories, put your company on students’ radars. This proactive approach helps build brand awareness and fosters a sense of affinity among potential candidates, making them more likely to consider your organization when they enter the job market.
  • Identifying and Nurturing Top Talent: Early engagement allows you to identify promising students and build relationships with them over time. Through interactions like competitions and workshops, you can assess their skills, potential, and cultural fit in a less formal setting than a typical interview. This provides a valuable opportunity to nurture their interest and position your company as their employer of choice.
  • Reducing Time-to-Hire and Cost-per-Hire: By building relationships with potential candidates early, you can significantly streamline the hiring process when they are ready to apply. Having a pool of engaged and pre-qualified individuals can reduce the time spent on sourcing and screening during peak hiring seasons, ultimately lowering your cost-per-hire.
  • Gaining a Competitive Edge: In today’s competitive talent landscape, Early Talent Engagement provides a crucial advantage. While others are focused on the same pool of candidates during placement season, you are already building relationships and positioning yourself where the competition isn’t even looking. This proactive approach allows you to secure top talent before your competitors even have a chance.

The Building Blocks of Early Talent Engagement: Making the Right Moves

So, how can organizations effectively execute the Early Talent Engagement strategy? The Unstop Talent Report 2025 highlights several key approaches that winning recruiters are employing:

  • Company-Led Competitions: Students view competitions as the ultimate proving ground, a platform to sharpen their skills and showcase their talent. Companies that run competitions not only hire faster but also hire better. These events provide a valuable opportunity to interact with students, assess their abilities in a real-world context, and build a pipeline of engaged candidates. While nearly 70% of students prioritize competitions, only 25% of recruiters prefer them as their primary engagement strategy, highlighting a significant gap.
  • Job and Internship Openings on Job Boards (for Future Roles): Even if you don’t have immediate openings, posting potential future opportunities or highlighting the types of roles you typically recruit for keeps your company visible and signals your ongoing talent needs.
  • Sharing Employee Stories and New Joiner Experiences: Authentic posts by employees and new joiners offer students a glimpse into your company culture and the experiences of working at your organization. This humanizes your brand and helps potential candidates envision themselves as part of your team.
  • Engaging Social Media Content and Career Pages: Your social media presence and career page are crucial touchpoints for Early Talent Engagement. Share engaging content that showcases your company culture, values, and career growth opportunities. Make your career page informative and easy to navigate, providing students with the information they need to learn more about your organization and potential career paths.
  • Employer Branding Activities: Proactive employer branding initiatives, beyond just job posts, create real experiences that make students take notice. This could include virtual information sessions, webinars, or participation in relevant student events (even if not directly for immediate hiring).
  • Third-Party Media Features: Securing features in relevant student publications or online platforms can increase your company’s visibility and reach among your target audience. It’s not just about showing up; it’s about engineering engagement before the game even begins. It’s about making students feel your company culture, not just talking about it. It’s about creating moments where students want to be part of your brand, not just posting job openings.

Rethinking the Offer: Compensation as a Key Engagement Tool in Early Talent Engagement

While Early Talent Engagement lays the foundation, compensation remains a critical factor in attracting and securing top talent. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 emphasizes that compensation isn’t just about numbers; it’s the silent decision-maker. Students are already betting on who’s offering the best deal. To effectively engage talent early, your compensation strategy needs to be competitive and aligned with Gen Z expectations.

  • Understanding Salary Benchmarks: The report provides valuable insights into fixed annual CTCs across different fields and qualifications. Being aware of these benchmarks is crucial to ensure your early offers are attractive.
  • Considering Stipends for Early Internships: Internships are often the starting point for the real-world salary conversation. However, the report highlights that a significant portion of undergrads had unpaid internships in 2024. Offering fair stipends for early internships is a powerful way to engage students and demonstrate your commitment to valuing their contributions.
  • Beyond Just the Numbers: While in-hand salary is non-negotiable, students also weigh factors like variable pay, retention bonuses, performance bonuses, perks & benefits, Sustainability and ESOPs. Structuring your early offers thoughtfully, considering these additional components, can significantly enhance their appeal.

Are the Pieces Ready to Move? Skills and Readiness in Early Talent Engagement

Early Talent Engagement also provides an opportunity to gauge the readiness of potential candidates. The Unstop Talent Report 2025 reveals a disconnect between degrees and perceived job readiness, with only 25% of students feeling very well prepared for the job market. This presents an opportunity for early engagement initiatives like workshops and competitions to help bridge this gap and assess practical skills.

  • Focusing on Skills Over Tags: Recruiters are increasingly prioritizing skills over premier college tags. Early Talent Engagement allows you to assess these crucial skills – communication & interpersonal skills, problem-solving & critical thinking, adaptability & flexibility, creativity & innovation, and domain-specific competence – through interactive engagements.
  • Utilizing Innovative Evaluation Methods: While behavioural interviews remain popular, the report highlights that Gen Z engages in case studies, ideathons, quizzes, and simulations. Incorporating these methods into your early engagement strategy can provide a more holistic evaluation of a candidate’s abilities.

The Blunder & The Brilliance: Understanding Gen Z’s Mindset in Early Talent Engagement

Gen Z isn’t following a set playbook; their aspirations are shaped by ambition, values, and opportunities. Understanding their goals and preferences is crucial for effective Early Talent Engagement.

  • Beyond Just a Job: Gen Z seeks stability, growth, and innovation in their job choices. They prioritize professional growth and skill-building. Early Talent Engagement should highlight these aspects of your company culture and career paths.
  • Flexibility and Feedback: They value work-life balance and prefer monthly or project-based feedback. Early engagement should incorporate opportunities for interaction and feedback, signalling your company’s responsiveness to their expectations.
  • Multiple Income Streams: A significant 51% of Gen Z want to build multiple income streams through side hustles and freelancing. Acknowledging this and perhaps even highlighting opportunities within your organization that allow for or don’t hinder such pursuits can be an engagement point.

Endgame or Opening Move? Early Engagement as the Foundation

Early Talent Engagement isn’t the endgame; it’s the crucial opening move in building a sustainable talent pipeline. By making this strategic knight’s move, organizations can position themselves to capture the best talent before the intense competition of placement season even begins. It requires a shift in mindset, a proactive approach, and a genuine commitment to building relationships with future talent.

Here’s What I Think:

I believe that Early Talent Engagement has evolved from being a mere advantage to a critical strategy for organizations aiming to secure top talent in India’s shifting hiring landscape, particularly in graduate recruitment.

The insights from the Unstop Talent Report 2025 indicate that Gen Z, the workforce of tomorrow, values early and meaningful interactions with potential employers. By adopting a proactive approach, leveraging engaging activities like competitions and workshops, and understanding the priorities of this generation, companies can build strong employer brands, nurture relationships with high-potential candidates, and ultimately gain a significant competitive advantage. Waiting for the placement season is akin to playing catch-up before the game even starts. The knight’s move, while unconventional, offers a strategic leap towards building a future-ready workforce. It’s about playing the talent game smarter, not just harder.

Sources of Insights:

  1. Unstop Talent Report 2025